Goals of C Kirk Psyop

cript


0:01
Hello everyone. I'm Tracy Derwin and I'm
0:03
here with Shane Bure. In today's video,
0:07
we'll be providing some examples of the
0:10
SCOP that's happening, the angles that
0:13
are being initiated today in reaction to
0:16
the shooting of Charlie Kirk. So, I'll
0:20
let um Shane go into more details and
0:23
he'll be sharing some examples of this
0:26
uh from the past.
0:29
All right, thanks Tracy. So what we're
0:32
seeing today is kind of an Operation
0:34
Gladadio style SCOP where they're trying
0:36
to promote division between the left and
0:39
the right and whip them up into a frenzy
0:41
through this like, you know, uh
0:44
traumatic emotional experience, you
0:46
know, that they're trying to perpetrate.
0:47
So this is trauma based mind control on
0:49
a mass scale. And so they're trying to
0:51
whip up the left and the right and pit
0:53
them against each other for an attack on
0:55
free speech. and it begins with free
0:56
speech, but they're coming after many of
0:58
the constitutional rights. So, free
1:01
speech, uh, self-defense, right to
1:03
privacy, and possibly even search and
1:05
seizure are going to be affected in the
1:06
near future. And so, what they're doing
1:08
now is they're trying to draft this
1:11
Charlie Kirk Act, which is supposed to
1:14
well, it's actually going to limit free
1:16
speech. And, uh, so the right is
1:17
crafting this to be used against the
1:19
left, but the left is also, you know,
1:22
going to use it against the right as
1:23
well. So what we're seeing right now is
1:24
an attack on free speech, but it will
1:26
lead to loss of the other constitutional
1:28
rights as well. So now if you guys
1:30
aren't familiar with Gladio, I'm just
1:31
going to show some stuff here. This is
1:33
basically what's going on. It's a deeper
1:34
operation designed to ferment chaos and
1:36
division within the US. And they've done
1:38
this before with Operation Gladadio. And
1:41
now they're doing it on a much larger
1:43
scale. But what we need to do is try to
1:45
keep cooler heads and not fall into the
1:48
scop, right? because they want us to
1:50
they want to perpetrate this
1:52
trauma-based mind control on us so that
1:54
we will be more easily controllable,
1:56
more easily provoked into reaction. And
2:00
so what the, you know, the left is
2:02
doing, they're saying, you know, there's
2:03
freedom of speech, but not freedom of
2:05
consequences. So yes, you can exercise
2:07
your rights of free speech, but then
2:08
they will act violently towards you like
2:10
what we saw happen to Charlie Kirk. And
2:12
the right is saying, well, if you
2:14
violate, you know, if you if you they
2:16
call it hate speech, right? So if you if
2:18
you if you promote hate speech, then
2:20
we're going to censor you, right? And so
2:23
either way, it's an attack on free
2:24
speech. You know, if you exercise your
2:26
free speech rights from the right side
2:29
of the spectrum, then you risk potential
2:31
violence. And if you're on the left and
2:33
you exercise your freedom of speech and
2:35
freedom of expression, then you risk
2:37
censorship and a violation of your
2:38
privacy, which is what we're seeing now.
2:40
So that's how it begins. And uh I just
2:43
want to say that there's another example
2:45
that this radical freedom branded terror
2:47
and assassinations immediately recalled
2:49
the Gladadio playbook. And this poster
2:51
was aware that Gladadio was a so-called
2:53
right-wing anti-siet operation. But the
2:55
pattern of using mass shooting,
2:57
assassination, and terrorist strategies
2:58
are identical. And those strategies are
3:02
called a strategy of tension. A strategy
3:04
of tension is a political policy where
3:06
violent struggle is encouraged rather
3:08
than suppressed. The purpose is to
3:10
create a general feeling of insecurity
3:12
in the population and make people seek
3:14
security in a strong government. Now,
3:16
that strategy is most closely identified
3:18
with the years of lead in Italy from
3:20
1968 to 1982 in which far-left Marxist
3:23
groups, far-right neofascist extra
3:25
parliamentary groups and state
3:26
intelligence agencies performed
3:28
bombings, kidnappings, arson, and
3:31
murders. And this all kind of fits into
3:34
the Hegelian dialectic of problem,
3:37
reaction, solution. So they have this
3:39
agenda which is pre-formed that they
3:40
want to implement and they have to
3:42
create a thesis which is the problem and
3:45
the anti-thesis which is the reaction
3:47
which leads to their solution. So in
3:49
this example they want a centralized
3:50
power. So they create a terror event
3:53
which gives an excuse to increase the
3:54
police state and their end goal is
3:56
achieved by removing freedoms and
3:58
transferring power. So like I said this
4:00
is problem reaction solution. They
4:02
create a problem by arming and funding
4:03
extremists to take down opponents by
4:05
proxy. And they incite a reaction from
4:07
the public by demonizing the same bad
4:09
guys that you put into power that the
4:11
other side has secretly put into power.
4:13
And then they propose a solution which
4:15
involves a military intervention, the
4:17
loss of liberties or both. And we're
4:20
actually starting to see that now which
4:22
uh one of these is a house bill which
4:25
has made it illegal for US defense
4:27
contractors to boycott Israel. So now
4:30
weapons manufacturers will now be
4:31
legally bound to keep arming Israel by
4:33
order of Congress. And uh Loheed has
4:36
already been sharing most of their
4:38
technology and information with Rafael
4:40
Advanced Defense Systems of Israel. But
4:42
now the other defense contractors like
4:44
Rathon North of Grumman and so forth
4:46
will also be forced to sell their
4:48
technology to Israel. Um, another thing
4:51
that we're actually starting to see now
4:53
is actually Marco Rubio has tried to
4:56
introduce a bill to revoke the passports
4:58
of US citizens if they criticize Israel.
5:00
And Florida Congressman Brian Mass is
5:02
intro introducing a bill that could
5:04
potentially be used to deny US citizens
5:06
the right to travel. So, uh, this is
5:09
probably what's going to get written
5:10
into the Charlie Kirk Act and they're
5:12
going to pretend like it's a reinst
5:15
they're reinstating the Smith Act, but
5:17
that's not what it is. So for those who
5:19
don't know, the Smith Munt Act was
5:22
actually made to prevent the government
5:24
from propagandizing the people. It was
5:26
repealed by Obama in 2012. And that's
5:29
why we've seen so much fake news in over
5:32
the last 12 13 years is because they've
5:34
repealed this act. And now the
5:36
government is allowed to propagandize
5:37
the people again. But what's actually
5:39
going to happen is when they rewrite
5:40
this bill, they're going to rewrite it
5:42
so that it's going to limit the speech
5:45
of independent journalists and
5:47
individual Americans so that they can't
5:49
speak out against the government. And
5:50
the reason for that is because of um all
5:53
these, you know, counternarratives to
5:54
the official story are really hurting
5:56
the official story and making the FBI
5:58
look really bad. And so what they're
6:00
going to do is use this to limit our
6:03
free speech and not the government
6:04
propaganda. And uh so Thomas Massie
6:08
actually did comment on this. He said uh
6:10
the Smith Act repealed the prohibition
6:13
that kept the US government from using
6:14
propaganda on the US. And he voted
6:16
against the NDAA in 2012. And he
6:19
recently offered an amendment to
6:21
reinstate the prohibition, but it was
6:23
blocked. So what's going on now is
6:25
they're rewriting it and turning it into
6:28
the Charlie Kirk Act, which is going to
6:29
be the exact opposite of the Smith Act.
6:32
It's not going to prevent the government
6:33
from propagandiz propagandizing us. It's
6:36
going to prevent us from speaking out
6:38
against the official narratives.
6:40
I kind of see, you know, what happened
6:42
in 2020. Anyone that, you know, went
6:45
against the narrative that the CDC was
6:47
putting out was silenced. So many
6:49
accounts got taken down. You really
6:51
couldn't post anything um against, you
6:55
know, the the things that they were
6:56
rolling out. And I kind of see this
6:59
topic any kind of anti-Israel posts are
7:03
going to be just taken off and accounts
7:05
suspended.
7:07
Yeah. Yeah. And it's not just
7:08
anti-Israel. So yeah, CO was a good
7:11
example where you had the leftwing
7:14
saying, you know, get vaxed or lose your
7:16
job. And if anyone in the right wing who
7:18
was trying to speak out against the the
7:20
the COVID scop, you know, they were
7:24
actually, you know, being suppressed as
7:27
well. So they were losing their jobs for
7:29
speaking out against it and not getting
7:30
vaxed. And now we have kind of the
7:32
reverse situation going on where people
7:34
are expressing, you know, their either
7:37
hatred or dissatisfaction or whatever it
7:39
is with Charlie Kirk or with whatever is
7:41
going on. And now the right-wing in
7:44
their frenzy is actually reacting to the
7:47
leftwing expressing their freedom of
7:49
speech and they're saying, "Okay, you
7:50
know, we're going to violate your
7:51
privacy. You know, if you speak out,
7:54
you're going to lose your job." And
7:55
we're starting to see that. So cancel
7:57
culture has now shifted from the left to
7:59
the right. So back in COVID, the
8:02
leftwing was using cancel culture
8:03
against the right and now it's the
8:05
right-wing's turn to use cancel culture
8:07
against the left. And that's exactly
8:08
what we're seeing.
8:10
Well, you want to get into some of these
8:11
clips of Max?
8:14
Uh, sure. Yeah, we're going to go ahead
8:16
and play uh some clips here that uh
8:18
support this as well. And this is Max
8:20
Blumenthal talking about the 1% golden
8:23
age that Trump wants to bring. We're
8:25
just constantly being pitted against
8:27
each other by narratives that come from
8:29
the top. And that is where Trump wants
8:33
this to go because Trump has promised a
8:35
new golden age for the 1%. It's not for
8:38
the rest of us. And the 1% is has been
8:41
terrified. Not just since the Charlie
8:44
Kirk shooting is primarily terrifying
8:46
the podcaster class. Since the shooting
8:48
of I think his name was Brian Johnson,
8:50
the United Healthcare CEO by Luigi
8:52
Manion.
8:54
Steve Bannon, former Trump chief of
8:56
staff, gave a talk to a group of
8:59
financial elites and tech elites. I
9:02
believe it was in Silicon Valley. Many
9:04
of them were not Republicans. And he
9:06
said, "Here is our promise to you.
9:08
Here's why." This was like, I think at
9:09
the beginning of the second Trump term.
9:12
He said, "This is why you should support
9:14
MAGA because this guy Luigi Manion went
9:16
out and shot one of you. This is going
9:19
to happen more and more. We are entering
9:20
a period of social unrest and social
9:22
social turmoil and we will protect you.
9:26
So what we are going to see now is a
9:28
policy crafted for the elite that is
9:31
terrified of this environment and at the
9:33
same time a policy to drive us the rest
9:35
of us who have nothing who are in debt
9:39
who are uh don't really see much of a uh
9:44
a financial future in the US.
9:47
We're they're going to pit us all
9:48
against each other through a strategy of
9:50
tension and then repress us all and let
9:53
us say whatever we want online. We won't
9:55
be banned anymore. We can say whatever
9:57
we want on Elon's Twitter X. We have
9:59
freedom of speech. As he said, we have
10:00
freedom of speech, but not freedom of
10:02
reach. And that freedom of speech will
10:03
be used to surveil us further and ruin
10:07
our lives if we are provoked into saying
10:10
the wrong things.
10:11
All right. And then I'm gonna play
10:12
another excerpt from that interview with
10:14
Max Blumenthal and he's talking about
10:16
the Charlie Kirk Act.
10:18
It's going to look a lot like the
10:19
McCarthy era and that is an in been a
10:21
major inspiration to the right. Um you
10:25
know we've seen right-wing organizations
10:27
like um what was it? Uh CPAC I think was
10:31
giving out like young McCarthy awards
10:34
back during the mid 2000s. Um Steven
10:36
Miller I think sees McCarthy as sort of
10:40
a hero.
10:42
And so what has the Trump administration
10:45
done? They have gotten Berkeley
10:48
UC Berkeley to furnish a na uh a list of
10:52
160
10:54
anti-Israel anti-semitic professors with
10:56
professor Judith Butler at the top of
10:58
it.
11:00
That's what we're seeing along with the
11:02
defunding of universities for allowing
11:05
students for justice in Palestine to
11:07
exist, for allowing protests on their
11:09
campus. It's a the biggest free speech
11:12
crackdown possibly since the McCarthy
11:15
era, certainly the most transparent one.
11:17
And it's being conducted in many cases
11:20
on behalf of a foreign apartheid state.
11:22
The Charlie Kirk Act that's being pushed
11:24
online is an attack on media
11:27
independence and will do a a lot of what
11:32
the Biden administration was doing to
11:34
online media, which is to censor and
11:38
punish any media organization or
11:40
individual who's accused of mis or
11:43
disinformation.
11:45
I don't. And so the right is basically
11:47
picking up where the Biden
11:48
administration left off, just directing
11:50
it against their enemies. I don't think
11:51
that will um be the form that such an
11:54
act takes, but I expect some kind of uh
11:57
Charlie Kirk act to take place. I expect
12:00
the uh investigation that the FBI is
12:03
carrying out to be incomplete just as
12:05
the investigation of the the Butler
12:07
shooting, the Butler PA shooting.
12:10
Uh we we it feels like that was shut
12:12
down.
12:15
Yeah. So what we're seeing here is a
12:17
resurgence of neoccarthyism
12:19
which is similar to what happened during
12:21
the red scare where they can accuse one
12:23
side of being something that they're not
12:25
and use that as justification to take
12:27
action against them. All right. So uh
12:30
now I want to get into a little bit of
12:32
how the left and the right are kind of
12:34
behaving in similar ways as if they were
12:37
this totalitarian uni party trying to go
12:40
against the individual people. I just
12:42
want to take a minute to talk about the
12:43
uni party. And I don't mean the
12:45
political uni party taking all the money
12:48
from the same people, advocating for the
12:49
same causes, usually war, endless war. I
12:51
want to talk about the uni party inside
12:53
the voting population. It's been really
12:55
disheartening to watch the right become
12:57
the left. After 2016, liberals had just
13:00
reeled into derangement. I mean, they
13:02
could not see straight foaming at the
13:04
mouth. They wanted to censor everybody.
13:05
They called everybody a Nazi. Everybody
13:06
was a fascist. Everybody was a racist.
13:08
Everybody was a bigot. Punch him in the
13:09
mouth if you have to. They went out
13:10
there and they were cancelling everybody
13:12
and so now we're going to call up your
13:13
boss and we're going to get you fired.
13:15
During co a lot of us saw the right
13:17
behaving differently and many of us who
13:18
came from more traditional leftist
13:20
circles thought, "Oh my gosh, I I cannot
13:22
believe that I'm actually aligning with
13:23
the right." And many of us flipped kind
13:24
of over to the other side only to have
13:26
this other side now fail just miserably
13:29
going into the exact same woke brain
13:32
that the left went into. What am I
13:34
seeing all day today? I am seeing so
13:36
many right-wing accounts celebrating
13:39
cancelling people. I mean they are
13:40
actively out there cancelling people.
13:42
One account on Twitter was saying I had
13:43
to contact over 250 companies today
13:46
about their employees and all of these
13:48
people on the right were championing
13:50
them. They were reporting employees like
13:52
a liberal. That is cancel culture. That
13:54
is exactly what it is. Not only cancel
13:56
culture, censorship culture.
13:57
Right-wingers talking out of both sides
13:59
of their mouth saying the violence that
14:01
fell upon Charlie Kirk is a direct
14:03
result of Democrats calling us fascists.
14:06
So they're saying that and then at the
14:08
same time literally turning around and
14:11
calling Democrats fascists and saying
14:13
that they're dangerous. And now you've
14:14
got a bunch of people online on the
14:16
right saying we've got to do something
14:17
about these liberals. Like talking like
14:18
they've got to enact violence against
14:20
liberals in order to stop liberals from
14:22
being violent. Make that make sense.
14:24
Make that make sense.
14:27
Yeah.
14:28
I wanted to bring up something that uh
14:30
I've hadn't had a chance to. So when the
14:34
videos of the shooting, which were
14:37
uncensored, and I got them all over my
14:39
feed, uh normally AI will catch that. So
14:43
from a creator standpoint, if you show
14:46
something like that on your video, uh in
14:50
order to u let them put it out, they
14:53
have to put some kind of warning. So
14:54
like 18 and over only. And then often if
14:58
you if you want to watch it, you have to
15:00
click on something in order for you to
15:02
see it. Um, and that those types of
15:05
videos are often suppressed, so they're
15:07
not shown to a big audience. But with
15:10
this, I feel like it was not censored.
15:13
And there was um a force trying to get
15:16
it out to everyone to see just how
15:19
gruesome and just how um you know to see
15:23
the violence and you know to create this
15:26
emotional reaction that we're all
15:28
having.
15:30
Absolutely. Yeah. Basically what we're
15:32
seeing is the trauma- based mind control
15:34
on the masses. So they're we're
15:36
basically almost everyone is now being
15:38
subject to MK Ultra like mind control
15:41
and that happens to begin with
15:42
trauma-based mind control. So I think
15:44
that's why they've been pushing that out
15:45
there so that everyone actually gets to
15:47
see it. And I will actually even admit
15:50
to myself that I was traumatized by
15:52
seeing that video, you know, and I've
15:54
probably retraumat retraumatized myself
15:56
about a hundred times analyzing that the
15:58
footage. So, you know, they're spreading
16:00
it far and wide instead of suppressing
16:02
it like you would normally expect them
16:03
to do. And I think that's to propagate
16:05
that mass mind control through
16:07
trauma-based mind control.
16:09
And uh and that does Yeah. And it does
16:12
kind of remind me of George Orwell's
16:14
1984 how they had a Ministry of Truth in
16:17
there. And uh I'm going to play another
16:19
example of Kim talking about this as
16:22
well,
16:22
but he's saying, "I want the Smith Munt
16:24
Act and I'm going to restore it." Mike
16:26
and Thomas Massiey's like, "Yeah, let's
16:27
vote for that." Ellie May is saying
16:29
something totally different.
16:32
She's wanting for
16:35
all journalists, whether they be
16:37
mainstream or independent, to be
16:38
silenced, to not be able to criticize
16:40
whoever it is, to not be able to to not
16:43
be able to say what she deems in her
16:44
Ministry of Truth. And when the
16:46
government creates the Ministry of
16:47
Truth, whatever they deem to be the
16:49
truth. That is what she's calling for.
16:51
You have to stop this these lies. The
16:54
people that called them Nazis f you have
16:55
to stop this. Right? So that is uh I
16:59
mean sounds exactly like the left. And
17:00
then Biden created his own mis ministry
17:03
of truth and now Trump is retweeting
17:05
this video and many of the lawmakers are
17:07
talking about basically creating the
17:09
Ministry of Truth. They're calling it,
17:10
oh, we're just going to bring back the
17:11
Smith Munt Act just to confuse you. But
17:15
really, they're going to modify it.
17:16
They're going to rewrite it. It won't
17:17
look anything like the Smith Act.
17:18
Instead, it's going to be we're allowed
17:20
to
17:22
um sanction do something to people that
17:25
we don't like what their message is. We
17:27
think their message is wrong and not the
17:29
truth. And so we're going to be the
17:31
truth police and we're going to go
17:32
around and we're going to tell people
17:33
what they can and cannot say. That is
17:34
what they're planning on doing. And
17:36
they're putting it under the guise of
17:37
the Smith Act so that when you look that
17:38
up, you're like, "Oh, that doesn't sound
17:40
bad. That actually sounds pretty good. I
17:42
don't want the government to
17:43
propagandize me, right? I don't either."
17:45
So I say, "Bring it back." But that's
17:48
not what they're going to do. They're
17:50
instead establishing their own Ministry
17:52
of Truth. And that's the scary part
17:53
about this is that there's a
17:55
misunderstanding of what the Smith Act
17:57
is. They're saying that they're going to
17:58
reestablish it because they don't know
18:00
what they're talking about. They're
18:01
going to rename it Charlie Kirk Act, but
18:04
they're really just going to silence
18:05
disscent, silence voices they don't
18:07
like. And I didn't like it when the left
18:09
did it, and I don't like it when the
18:11
right's doing it.
18:14
You know what? We're I'm going to link
18:15
that video because this this this
18:18
information we're providing, it's very
18:21
important that we get the word out
18:23
because if not enough people really
18:26
understand this this change, they're
18:29
going to vote for it and think it's a
18:30
good thing and support their
18:32
representatives to vote for it. But, you
18:36
know, we really I know I asked you guys
18:38
to to share all my videos, but really
18:40
with this one, you know, share it far
18:42
and wide. And if you want something
18:44
shorter, we'll link the video of um Kim,
18:47
which is under two minutes, so you can
18:49
send those out, too.
18:51
Yeah.
18:52
Yeah. So, basically, the you know,
18:54
George Orwell's Ministry of Truth is
18:56
coming true in the Charlie Kirk Act.
18:59
Okay. Well, that's going to do it for
19:01
today. Thank you guys so much for
19:03
watching. And we'll also keep the I'll
19:06
try to keep up when they vote on this.
19:09
I'm guessing it's going to go through
19:10
the House and the Senate. Um because I'm
19:13
also afraid that when this vote happens,
19:17
something else is going to happen and
19:18
everyone's going to be pay paying
19:19
attention to that just like how they
19:21
voted against the Epstein list on the
19:24
day that Charlie Kirk was shot right
19:26
that day. So, no one really paid
19:29
attention to that. So, um we'll I'll
19:32
definitely try to keep you guys updated
19:34
on when this change is going to be um
19:37
voted on. So, that's going to do it for
19:39
today. Thank you guys so much for
19:40
watching and we'll see you all soon.